CRIANÇAS, CONHECIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E PERCEPÇÕES AMBIENTAIS: O QUE A EDUCAÇÃO ESCOLAR TEM A VER COM ISSO?
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Referências
ALVES, R. R. N. et al. Students’ attitudes toward and knowledge about snakes in the semiarid region of Northeastern. Brazilian Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, v. 10, p. 2-8, 2014.
ANGELINI, R.; FERREIRA, J. S.; ARAÚJO, C. S. C.; CARVALHO, A. R. Effect of Outdoor and Laboratorial Environment Science Activities on Middle School Students Understanding on Conservation. Natureza & Conservação, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-5, 2011.
BALLOUARD, J-M.; BRISCHOUX, F.; BONNET, X. Children Prioritize Virtual Exotic Biodiversity over Local Biodiversity. PLoS One, v. 6, n. 8, p. e23152, 2011.
BALMFORD, A. et al. Why conservationists should heed Pókemon. Science, v. 295, n. 5564, p. 2367, 2002.
BARLOW, J. et al. Clarifying Amazonian’s burning crisis. Global Change Biology, v. 26, n. 2, p. 319-321, 2020.
BENTO-SILVA, J. S. et al. Student’s perception of urban and rural environmental protection areas in Pernambuco, Brazil. Tropical Conservation Science, v. 8, n. 3, p. 813-827, 2015.
BRANDÃO, C. R. O que é educação. 19. ed. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1989.
BRUM, H. D.; CAMPOS-SILVA, J. V.; OLIVEIRA, E. G. Brazil oil spill response: Government inaction. Science, v. 367, n. 6474, p. 155-156, 2020.
CALLAHAN, M. M. et al. Using the Phylo Card Game to advance biodiversity conservation in an era of Pokémon. Palgrave Communications, v. 5, p. 79-88, 2019.
CARDOSO-SILVA, C. B.; OLIVEIRA, A. C. Como os livros didáticos de biologia abordam as diferentes formas de estimar a biodiversidade? Ciência & Educação, v. 19, n. 1, p. 169-180, 2013.
CARVALHO, W. D. et al. Deforestation control in the Brazilian Amazon: a conservation struggle being lost as agreements and regulations are subverted and bypassed. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, v. 17, n. 3, p. 122-130, 2019.
CASTRO, L. R. B. et al. Os biomas brasileiros nos livros didáticos de Ciências: um olhar ao Pampa Gaúcho. Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Educación en Ciências, v. 14, n. 1, p. 38-49, 2019.
CRESPI, L.; NORO, D.; NÓBILE, M. F. A primeira infância no Brasil: aspectos históricos e fundamentos transdisciplinares. Pedagog. Foco, v. 13, p. 37-51, 2018.
CUNHA, A. M. de O.; KRASILCHIK, M. A Formação Continuada de Professores de Ciências: percepções a partir de uma experiência. In: XXIII Reunião Anual da ANPED. Caxambú, 2000.
ENSINECAST. Ciências naturais e educação. 2020. Disponível em: https://ensinecast.wixsite.com/website. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2020.
ESCOBAR, H. Bolsonaro’s first moves have Brazilian scientists worried. Science, v. 363, n. 6425, p. 330, 2019.
FEARNSIDE, P. M. Belo Monte: actors and arguments in the struggle over Brazil’s most controversial Amazonian dam. Revista Nera, v. 42, p. 162-185, 2017.
FEARNSIDE, P. M. Will President Bolsonaro Withdraw Brazil from the Paris Agreement? 2019. Disponível em: https://news.mongabay.com/2019/01/commentary-will-president-bolsonaro-withdraw-brazil-from-the-paris-agreement/. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2020.
FERRANTE, L.; FEARNSIDE, P. M. Brazil’s new president and ‘ruralists’ threaten Amazonian’s environment, traditional peoples and the global climate. Environmental Conservation, v. 46, p. 261-263, 2019.
FERREIRA, J. et al. Brazil’s environmental leadership at risk. Science, v. 346, n. 6210, p. 706-707, 2014.
FOLKE, C.; GUNDERSON, L. A kaleidoscope of change. Conservation Ecology, v. 6, n. 1, p. 19, 2002.
FRANCO, M. T. et al. Children as curators: how to incorporate young visitors’ voices into the elaboration and evaluation of a microbiology exhibition. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, v. 26, n. 1, p. 85-101, 2019.
FREITAS, L. C. Ciclos, Seriação e Avaliação – Confronto de lógicas. São Paulo: Moderna, 2003.
FREITAS, M. R. et al. Environmental perception and activities in environmental education based on socio-ecological resilience. Ambiente & Educação, v. 22, n. 1, p. 314-332, 2017.
GOMES, M. A. A. et al. High school students' knowledge of endangered fauna in the Brazilian Cerrado: A cross-species and spatial analysis. PLoS One, v. 14, p. e0215959, 2019.
GONZALES, J. Brazil Wants to Legalize Agribusiness Leasing of Indigenous Lands, 2019. Disponível em: https://news.mongabay.com/2019/02/brazil-wants-to-legalize- agribusiness-leasing-of-indigenous-lands/. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2020.
JERONEN, E.; PALMBERG, I.; YLI-PANULA, E. Teaching Methods in Biology Education and Sustainability Education Including Outdoor Education for Promoting Sustainability - A Literature Review. Education Sciences, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1, 2017.
JOLY, C. A. et al. Brazilian assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services: summary for policy makers. Biota Neotropica, v. 19, n. 4, p. e20190865, 2019.
LOYOLA, R. Brazil cannot risk its environmental leadership. Diversity and Distributions, v. 20, n. 12, p. 1365-1367, 2014.
LÜDKE, M.; CRUZ, G. B. da. Aproximando universidade e escola de educação básica pela pesquisa. Cad. Pesquisa, v. 35, n. 125, p. 81-109, 2005.
LÜDKE, M.; MAGALHÃES, P. A.; MÁXIMO, V. C. O mestrado como via de formação de professores da educação básica para a pesquisa. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, v. 9, n. 16, 2012.
MASSARANI, L.; MOREIRA, I. C. Science communication in Brazil: A historical review and considerations about the current situation. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 88, n. 3, p. 1577-1595, 2016.
MELZER, P. Alien constructions: Science fictions and feminist thought. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006.
MULDER, M. B. et al. Knowledge and attitudes of children of the Rupununi: Implications for conservation in Guyana. Biological Conservation, v. 142, n. 4, p. 879-887, 2009.
NG, D. Phylo. The phylo(mon) project, 2010. Disponível em: http://phylogame.org. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2020.
PANDEY, P. D. Child participation for conservation of species andeco systems. Conservation Ecology, v. 7, n. 1, p. r2, 2003.
PARO, V. H. Gestão da escola pública: alguns fundamentos e uma proposta, n. 107 a 114. Gestão democrática da escola pública. São Paulo: Ática, 2003.
PEREIRA, E. J. A. L. et al. Policy in Brazil (2016–2019) threaten conservation of the Amazon rainforest. Environmental Science & Policy, v. 100, p. 8-12, 2019.
PORFIRIO, G.; SARMENTO, P.; FONSECA, C. Schoolchildren’s knowledge and perceptions of Jaguars, Pumas and smaller cats around a mosaic or protected areas in the Western Brazilian Pantanal. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, v. 13, n. 4, p. 241-249, 2014.
RAMOS, D. L. et al. Ecosystem Services Provided by Insects in Brazil: What Do We Really Know? Neotropical Entomology, v. 49, p. 783-879, 2020.
SACRISTÀN, J. G. et al. Saberes e incertezas sobre o currículo. Porto Alegre: Editora Penso, 2013.
SANTOS, F. R.; JÁCOMO, A. T. A.; SILVEIRA, L. Humans and jaguars in five Brazilian biomes: same country, different perceptions. Cat News, v. 4, p. 21-30, 2008.
SCALFI, G. et al. Animales notables: la percepción de los brasileños sobre la fauna en el billete del Real. Entreciencias: diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento, v. 4, n. 11, 2016.
SCARANO, F. R. Perspectives on biodiversity science in Brazil. Scientia Agricola, v. 64, p. 439-447, 2007.
SCHEIBE, L. Valorização e formação dos professores para a educação básica: questões desafiadoras para um novo Plano Nacional de Educação. Educ. Soc., v. 31, n. 112, p. 981-1000, 2010.
SMALL, E. The value of cartoons for biodiversity and conservation. Biodiversity, v. 17, n. 3, p. 106-114, 2016.
TOIVONEN, T., et al. Social media data for conservation science: A methodological overview. Biological Conservation, v. 233, p. 298-315, 2019.
VALE, M. M. et al. The Covid-19 pandemic as an opportunity to weaken environmental protection in Brazil. Biological Conservation, v. 255, p. 108994, 2021.
VIOLA, E.; GONÇALVES, V. K. Brazil ups and downs in global environmental governance in the 21st century. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 62, p. e010, 2019.
VITAL, A. V. Lapis Lazuli. Politics and aqueous contingency in the animation Steven Universe. Series – International Journal of TV, v. 4, n. 1, p. 51-62, 2018.
WU, Y. et al. Using social media to strengthen public awareness of wildlife conservation. Ocean & Coastal Management, v. 153, p. 76-83, 2018.