COMO A INSTRUÇÃO INFLUENCIA O DESENVOLVIMENTO CONCEITUAL: A TEORIA DE VYGOTSKY REVISITADA

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Marc Clarà

Resumo

Embora as interpretações atuais da teoria de Vygotsky assumam, em grande parte, que a instrução impulsiona o desenvolvimento, a questão de como isso ocorre ainda não foi esclarecida. Por exemplo, a noção de "zona de desenvolvimento proximal" despertou um forte desacordo, e a conceitualização comum da noção de "conceito não espontâneo" foi amplamente reconhecida como insatisfatória. Este artigo propõe uma nova interpretação da teoria do desenvolvimento cultural de Vygotsky, estreitamente baseada nos escritos de Vygotsky, que esclarece o porquê e como a instrução impulsiona o desenvolvimento e ressignifica as noções de zona de desenvolvimento proximal e de conceito não espontâneo. O artigo introduz nuances importantes nas interpretações amplamente realizadas da teoria de Vygotsky e discute algumas das implicações dessas nuances para a pesquisa e a prática em psicologia educacional.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
CLARÀ, M. COMO A INSTRUÇÃO INFLUENCIA O DESENVOLVIMENTO CONCEITUAL: A TEORIA DE VYGOTSKY REVISITADA. Revista Educativa - Revista de Educação, Goiânia, Brasil, v. 20, n. 3, p. 659–690, 2017. DOI: 10.18224/educ.v20i3.6844. Disponível em: https://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/educativa/article/view/6844. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2024.
Seção
Temas em Debate
Biografia do Autor

Marc Clarà, Departamento de Pedagogia e Psicologia, Universitat de Lleida, Espanha.

Departamento de Pedagogia e Psicologia, Universitat de Lleida, Espanha.

Referências

ALLAL, L.; DUCREY, G. P. Assessment "of"- or "in"- the Zone of Proximal Development. Learning and Instruction, v. 10, p.137-152, 2000.

BLUNDEN, A. Concepts: A critical approach. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2012.

BRUNER, J. The relevance of education. New York, NY: Norton, 1973.

CHAIKLIN, S. The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In: KOZULIN, A. et al. (Eds.). Vygotsky’s educational theory and practice in cultural context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 39- 64.

CHIRKOV, V. et al. Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 84, p. 97-110, 2003.

COLE, M. The zone of proximal development: where culture and cognition create each other. In: WERTSCH, J. V. (Ed.). Culture, communication and cognition. Vygotskyan perspectives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1985. p. 146-161.

COLE, M. Cognitive development and formal schooling: The evidence from cross-cultural research. In: MOLL, L. (Ed.). Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1990. p. 89-110.

DANIELS, H. Vygotsky and pedagogy. London, UK: Routledge Falmer. 2001.

DAVYDOV, V. V. Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1990 (Original work published 1972).

DEWEY, J. Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1930.

ENGESTRÖM, Y. Learning by expanding. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta- Konsulfit Oy, 1987.

ENGESTRÖM, Y. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, v. 14, 133-156, 2001.

FORMAN, E. A. The dialectic between embodied experiences and mathematical concepts. Commentary on Saxe, de Kirby, Kang, Le, and Schneider. Human Development, v. 58, p. 50-54, 2015.

GIBBONS, P. Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, v. 37, p. 247-273, 2003.

GLICK, J. Prologue. In: RIEBER, R. W. (Ed.). Collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (p. v–xvi). New York, NY: Plenum, 1997.

GOLDENBERG, C. Instructional conversations and their classroom applications (Educational Practice Report 2. Paper EPR02). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. 1991. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6q72k3k9.

GREDLER, M. E. Understanding Vygotsky for the classroom: Is it too late? Educational Psychology Review, v. 24, p. 113-131, 2012.

GUK, I.; KELLOGG, D. The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, v. 11, p. 281-299, 2007.

HAKKARAINEN, P.; BREDIKYTE, M. The zone of proximal development in play and learning. Cultural-Historical Psychology, v. 4, p. 2-11, 2008.

KOZULIN, A. Vygotsky’s psychology: a biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.

LANTOLF, J. P. Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment. Language Teaching, v. 42, p. 355-368, 2009.

LARRAÍN, A.; HAYE, A. A dialogical conception of concepts. Theory and Psychology, v. 24, p. 459-478, 2014.

LI, M. C.; TSAI, C. C. Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, v. 22, p. 877- 898, 2013.

MATUSOV, E. Applying a sociocultural approach to vygotskian academia: ‘Our tsar isn’t like yours, and yours isn’t like ours’. Culture and Psychology, v. 14, p. 5-35, 2008.

MERCER, N. Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London, UK: Routledge, 2000.

MONTESSORI, M. The discovery of the child. New York, NY: Ballantine Books, 1967.

NYIKOS, M.; HASHIMOTO, R. Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: in search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal, v. 81, p. 506-517, 1997.

OHTA, A. S. Interlanguage pragmatics in the zone of proximal development. System, v. 33, p. 503-517, 2005.

PALINCSAR, A. S.; BROWN, A. L. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, v. 1, p. 117-175, 1984.

PIAGET, J. Psicología y Pedagogía [Psychology and pedagogy]. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel, 1981/1969.

POEHNER, M. E.; LANTOLF, J. P. Vygotsky’s teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education: the case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, v. 17, p. 312-330, 2010.

PSALTIS, C.; DUVEEN, G.; PERRET-CLERMONT, A. N. The social and the psychological: Structure and context in intellectual development. Human Development, v. 52, p. 291-312, 2009.

ROJAS-DRUMMOND, S. et al. ‘Dialogic scaffolding’: Enhancing learning and understanding in collaborative contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, v. 2, p. 11-21, 2013.

ROSSEAU, J. J. Emile or on education (A. Bloom, Trans.). New York, NY: Basic Books, 1979.

SAKHAROV, L. Methods for investigating concepts. In: VAN DER VEER R.; VALSINER, J. (Eds.). The Vygotsky reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, p. 73-98, 1994.

SAXE, G. B. et al. Studying cognition through time in classroom community: the interplay between “everyday” and “scientific concepts”. Human Development, v. 58, p. 5-44, 2015.

SCHMITTAU, J. Vygotskian theory and mathematics education: Resolving the conceptual-procedural dichotomy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, v. 19, n. 1, p. 19-43, 2004.

SCHMITTAU, J. S. The development of algebraic thinking. A Vygotskian perspective. ZDM, v. 37, p.16-22, 2005.

SMIT, J.; VAN EERDE, H. A. A.; BAKKER, A. A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British Educational Research Journal, v. 39, p. 817-834, 2013.

THARP, R.; GALLIMORE, R. Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

THOMAS, J. W. A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: The Autodesk Foundation, 2000.

TOLMAN, C. The metaphysic of relations in Klaus Riegel’s “Dialectics” of human development. Human Development, v. 24, p. 33-51, 1981.

TOOMELA, A. Commentary: Vygotskian Cultural-historical and sociocultural approaches represent two levels of analysis: Complementarity instead of opposition. Culture and Psychology, v. 14, p. 57- 69, 2008.

TOWSEY, P.; KELLOGG, D.; COLE, M. The Symposium on Vygotsky’s Concepts: Part One [PDF notes]. 2010. Available from:

http://lchc. ucsd.edu/mca/Vygotsky_Concept_Symposium.pdf.

TOWSEY, P. M.; MACDONALD, C. A. Wolves in sheep’s clothing and other Vygotskian constructs. Mind, Culture and Activity, v. 16, p. 234-262, 2009.

TULVISTE, P. Cultural-historical development of verbal thinking. Commack, NY: Nova Science, 1991.

VAN COMPERNOLLE, R. A.; ZHANG, H. Dynamic assessment of elicited imitation: A case analysis of an advanced L2 English speaker. Language Testing, v. 31, p. 395-412, 2014.

VAN DE POL, J.; VOLMAN, M.; BEISHUIZEN, J. Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, v. 22, p. 271-296, 2010.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In: RIEBER R. W.; CARTON, A. S. (Eds.). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1: Problems of general psychology. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1987. p. 39-285.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. The problem of the cultural development of the child. In: VAN DER VEER, R.; VALSINER. J. (Eds.). The Vygotsky reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1994. p. 57-72.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. The problem of age (M. Hall, Trans.). In: RIEBER R. W. (Ed.). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5: Child psychology. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1998. p. 187-205.

WELLS, G. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

WERTSCH, J. V. Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.

WERTSCH, J.; TULVISTE, P. L. S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, v. 28, p. 548-557, 1992.

WOOD, D.; BRUNER, J. S.; ROSS, G. The role of tutoring in problem- solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, v. 17, p. 89-100, 1976.